This week’s readings dealt with organizational culture, so
to get a sense of how an organizational culture is implemented and maintained,
I interviewed a college Athletic Director with over 15 years experience in the
position. Because this person is still
working in their current role as Athletic Director, I have changed their name
in this post to ‘YY’.
AM: One of the
primary problems our readings discussed in regards to organizational culture is
that managers commonly need to make decisions quickly, without consulting the
higher-ups in the organization (Note on Organizational Culture, p. 1). Because of this, if you have managers with
different sets of ideals, it might be hard to complete the basic strategic tasks
of your organization (p. 1). What have
you found is the best strategy in regards to training your managers to make the
best decision possible quickly while also keeping in mind the organization’s
culture and goals?
YY: I think that if
you as the boss believe in the culture you have established, and the
organization’s goals and philosophies, that can rub off on your employees. People can see through phony words, so if
you don’t really believe in what you are selling them, they will see right
through it. If you genuinely are behind
the culture you’re instilling, it’s evident.
If people believe in you as their boss, they will believe in the culture
you are establishing. So I think the
best strategy is to train your employees as best you can in regards to what you
want and how you want it done, but with a sense of belief and pride in what
you’re teaching. That can be infectious,
and it can cause your managers to make the right decisions for your
company. If you believe, they’ll
believe.
AM: Another problem
companies face is maintaining their culture through employee turnover (Note on
Organizational Culture, p. 1). How have
you managed to maintain your department’s culture with the high turnover rate
you’ve experienced in the past ten years?
YY: This hasn’t been
a real problem for us, because I think the main thing you have to focus on is
consistently bringing in the right people to fit your philosophy, and to fit
your department’s culture. Once you have
the culture you want and the precedents you want to set, you simply hire people
who fit that mold. It’s much like being
a college athletics coach. You have in
mind a style of play you want to implement; a system that you feel will be
successful over the long-term and in the short-term. In order for it to truly be successful,
though, you have to consistently bring in players that fit your philosophy, and
fit your culture. That’s what I’ve tried
to do in hiring new employees, and so far it has worked. We are looking for smart, laid-back people
who are able to problem-solve and work under tight budgets, because that’s what
our current situation dictates. So if
you consistently find those people your organizational culture won’t skip a
beat.
AM: Lastly, an
organizational culture is said to be strong wen the basic assumptions are widely
shared by the members of the organization itself (Note on Organizational
Culture, p. 2). Based on this statement,
do you feel your department currently has a strong organizational culture?
YY: I think it does,
yes. I do not micro-manage my employees,
but I do let them know from the outset what my expectations are, and am quick
to correct when I feel they are not being met.
I think that has helped maintain the organizational culture, and has
helped it remain strong among our employees.
We are not a high-paying establishment, so people have to be behind what
our department stands for, and believe in where they are working, to remain
happy with their job. I think this has
been one of the things that keeps us going, the fact that we have found dedicated
employees who are not solely motivated by the numbers on their paycheck. It’s created an organizational culture that
is a great fit for our institution, and for college athletics as a whole. We are a team here, and that’s evident in how
we treat each other. That’s the culture
you have to have in this line of work, so it’s certainly nice to see.
Conclusions
I found it very interesting that YY stated that they
routinely try to find the best organizational fit in terms of hiring new
employees. This is direct contrast to
our readings from this week, which state that ‘an exclusive reliance on
selecting new employees based on cultural fit is a difficult (i.e., expensive
and time-consuming) means of creating a strong culture, and is difficult to
sustain with even moderate levels of employee turnover or growth’ (Note on
Organizational Culture, p. 3). I think
this is due to the fact that the department is extremely small, comprised of
only 11 full-time employees. This means
there isn’t quite as much turnover as in a larger organization, so it might not
be as hard to find the right fits for such a small department.
Also, I liked the concept of projecting belief in the
culture you are setting out as the head of the organization/department. This is something I feel significantly
motivates employees, and creates belief in the system you are
implementing. If you are instituting a
culture just because you feel it’s best, people can see that. But if you truly believe in it, that shows as
well, and it’s contagious. This is what
YY has been able to do extremely well, and their employees buy in to the
culture. It’s a powerful motivational
tool that ultimately doesn’t cost a dime, and can create an extremely strong
organizational culture in the process.
References
Sorenson, J. (2009). Note on Organizational Culture. Stanford
Business School, pp. 1-6.
Andrew, if the organization were to grow, do you think YY would need to change his hiring practices? What are some ways that the organization could socialize employees so they could rely less on ‘fit’? It seems with this organization that the culture come from the top. Do you think other employees influence the organizational culture as well?
ReplyDeleteHi Andrew,
ReplyDeleteGreat interview; I enjoyed YY’s perspective. I particularly like how YY draws a parallel between the skills necessary to coach a baseball team and the skills necessary maintain culture within his department. It sounds like part of the “style of play” that he describes in the organization may involve an element of “purpose and destiny” as described by Denison and Mishra. He talks about how money is not the sole underlying motivator for the team. How do you think this impacts the organization’s culture?