When the latest issue of Texas
Monthly, a monthly magazine that celebrates everything Texas, showed up in my mailbox this week, the
cover story grabbed my attention: “Luv & War: How Southwest Airlines
Battled the Worst Decade in Airline History – and Conquered the Skies.” Growing
up in Texas, Southwest Airlines was often the preferred airline for short jumps
across the state. San Antonio to Dallas, a drive that would take 5 or more
hours, was just a quick 45 minute hop. To Houston was even shorter: just 35
minutes in the air. I would always take Southwest back home for weekends in
college, going from Lubbock to San Antonio for less than $100 round trip. The
Southwest Airlines brand has grown to be as iconic as Imperial Sugar or the Dallas
Cowboys (Gwyne, 2012).
Southwest’s communication strategy is one of the major
reasons they have been successful in its 40+ year history when every other
major airline in the country has filed for bankruptcy (Gwyne, 2012). The airline
president and CEO, Gary Kelly, is ever-present in employees’ lives, from showing
up to announce the annual “Kick Tail” awards to dressing like a member from the
band Kiss at the annual Halloween party to having a say in what the company’s
160-member culture committee does.
But Southwest’s history hasn’t always been fun and games
with a culture filled with parties, pride and hot pants, which is what the
flight attendants (they called themselves hostesses) wore on all flights in the
1970s. In 1979, the Wright Amendment was passed, “which severely restricted
Southwest’s flights from its home base of (Dallas) Love Field.” Founder Herb
Kelleher quickly turned the airline into as much of a cause as a means of
getting around, and the company adopted LUV as its stock symbol on the New York
Stock Exchange (Gwyne, 2012). Kelleher rallied the employees behind the culture
revolution and the airline was blowing and going until the morning of September
11, 2001.
The airline industry seemed to have the bottom drop out of
it overnight after 9/11. In a new era of airport security, rising fuel costs
and extra fees, Southwest tried to be the anomaly. The airline communicated to
customers that they could cancel their reservations for no penalty, unlike what
every other major carrier in the US was doing, if they didn’t feel safe flying.
A well publicized event that happened the morning of 9/11 also has a positive
effect on the airline: the crew of a flight that was forced to land then
subsequently grounded in Grand Rapids, MI, unloaded all bags off the plane,
retuned them to passengers, bussed them to the nearest train station and bought
all of them train tickets back to their homes.
In 2002, Southwest found some more choppy air: it began a
two-year negotiation with its flight attendant union, who wanted better work
rules, benefits and compensation (Gwyne, 2012). The union held the “summer of
tough luv” where they took their cause to airports across the country. When an
agreement was reached two years later and the results shared with the
employees, a sea of scattered cheers and boos could be heard in the room
(Gwyne, 2012).
Southwest has also been strategic with the way it handles
fees. Southwest has always been the airline without fees, so when all other
major carriers began charging for bags, they came out with a new ad campaign to
highlight the fact that they don’t.
Real employees bared their chests and painted “bags fly free” on their skin
like frat boys at a college football game to get the message across. And it
worked. Southwest also strategically communicates it does not charge
reservation change fees or even cancellation fees. This worked, Kelleher said,
because they trust their customers and told them the truth about what they were
actually doing (Gwyne, 2012).
And now finally, rising fuel costs have put the brakes on
Southwest enormous profits. So what’s the solution: look into new markets.
Southwest recently purchased AirTran and has begun picking up some of its
routes to Mexico and the Caribbean. Kelleher believes the future profits of
Southwest will come to this expanded route network (Gwyne, 2012).
Southwest subscribes to the notion that “when companies
take a strategic
approach to communication, communication becomes
integral to the
formulation and implementation of strategy (Argenti, Howell and Beck, 2005,
p. 84). The role communications takes at SWA is a basis of why the company has
been so successful over the years, having only posted an annual loss the first
two years the airline was operating (Gwyne, 2012). Its CEO is a driver of
strategic communication, and its strategy has a multi-level approach, one
factor Argenti, Howell and Beck say is imperative (2005).
How will Southwest fare in the future? Nobody knows. But if
the company keeps its current strategy in place, something tells me they’ll do
just fine. The ticket prices might not be the lowest in the industry anymore,
but where else can you get a flight attendant to sing happy birthday over the
intercom, rap the safety instructions to you or act like they genuinely enjoy their job? Southwest, that’s where.
References:
References:
Gwynne, S.C. Luv and war at 30,000 feet: Texas Monthly, 2012 (vol. 40).
Argenti, P., Howell, R., Beck, K. (2005). The Strategic Communication Imperative, MIT Sloan Management Review, 46 #3, pp. 83-89
Lauren, you are now our resident expert on the airline industry! Between the 'summer of LUV' and 'pride and hot pants,' Southwest sounds like a fun place to be. We can also come back to this example when we study organizational culture.
ReplyDeleteAbout a year ago Southwest had some negative press when they kicked passengers off the plane for being overweight or affectionate lesbians. I wonder if Southwest failed to foresee the social issues that could become strategic (Bonini, Mendonca, & Oppenheim, 2006). If you remember this situation, do you think Southwest did a good job managing their communication? If not, what could they have done better? The Bonini et al. (2006) piece might give some insight.
The Southwest response to kicking the lesbians off the flight was:
Delete"Initial reports indicate that we received several passenger complaints characterizing the behavior as excessive. Our crew, responsible for the comfort of all Customers on board, approached the passengers based solely on behavior and not gender."
If I'm not mistaken, this subject has plagued SWA crew for quite some time (people being kicked off flights, pilots making off-hand comments, etc). Sounds like they need to have some diversity training! Also, instead of waiting for the people in this incident tweet about it, maybe Southwest should have been up front about what happened in the first place. But the other side to that is, two people were kicked off the flight for acting inappropriately. Why is that wrong? Sounds like the big deal is WHO was kicked off, not WHY.
Oh, and pretty much anything airplane or airline related, I'm all over. Not sure what my fascination is, but I have been enthralled with all things flying for as long as I can remember. My grandpa flew B-52s, and I think whatever gene he had that made him so fascinated with flying was passed down: my cousin, my five-year-old niece and I are all amazed with airplanes. My niece's favorite place to go in their town (Dayton) is the Air Force flight museum, and strangely enough, her favorite plane there is the B-52!
DeleteHi Lauren,
ReplyDeleteWhat a great post! I agree with all that you mention in the article, but as frequent flyer I am not currently happy with a Southwest change that the article failed to mention. Last year, without much notice to or input from the consumers/frequent flyers, they decided to change their rapid rewards travel policy. Before this change, you would get a segment point for every one-way or two segments for roundtrips. Their communications strategy failed to inform stakeholders like me why they were making this change and they did not even attempt to justify it. Since their rewards program is not as attractive as it used to be, I now do not use them for my quick LA trips - I use united where I have 100K status. Before, they made this change, they got my business for short trips, but I was so unhappy at their lack of regard for the loyal customer in their communications that they are no longer my airline of of choice. In my opinion, in their new frequent flyer program rollout, Herb failed to manage the sociopolitical implications (Bonini, Mendoca, & Oppenheim, 2006).
Adriana
The article actually touched very briefly about the frequent flyer program, and they claim that consumers actually prefer the new system. Shocking, isn't it? With new regulations and higher prices for everything, they're needing to scale back where they can, but still try to maintain their really awesome culture. I guess it's a trade-off.
DeleteLauren,
ReplyDeleteReally interesting pier on Southwest and its strategic communications. I have to admit before reading this I was not a southwest fan. I loved their commercials but didn't like their customer service. Felt like herding. However, the various aspects of the company communicating with its internal stakeholders and its communications team placing strategic cover so tires, like you mentioned have swayed my opinion on them a little.
Thanks for sharing,
~LaVenia
Funny you mention the herding mentality--that's actually one way (not having assigned seating) they are able to turn their planes so quickly and get them back up in the air. They did some studies in San Antonio and San Diego, and they found that not having assigned seating made the boarding process go faster. Before they started flying into major airports (like Boston Logan and LAX), their average turn-around time was actually about 15 minutes! Now it's about 30.
DeleteAs far as their customer service, I honestly have to say they are second to none. You can tell people who work at SWA genuinely enjoy their jobs and their coworkers, and stepping on board a Southwest jet is always such a welcome relief from stepping on an American flight with old, disgruntled, icky flight attendants, and with people who are wanting to save a buck by lugging their giant rolling suitcase on board with them. My company competes in what's called the Corporate Challenge every fall, and SWA is one of the other companies we compete against. And I have to say, we LOVE (or I guess in this case, luv?) competing against them because they are the nicest competitors out there. We cheer for them when we're not playing them, and I'm pretty sure they won the sportsmanship award this year.
Anyway, enough of this coffee-induced rant about why SWA rocks. Thanks for the comment, though--you made a really good point.